Does it amaze you as it does me, that in a generation, rainbow flags have become globally ubiquitous, that the LGBTQ+ movement is now visible in every subsection of society, including religion?
Hi, I’m Rex Rogers and this is episode #182 of Discerning What Is Best, a podcast applying unchanging biblical principles in a rapidly changing world, and a Christian worldview to current issues and everyday life.
In a few earlier podcasts, I’ve addressed what was once called Gay and is now called the LGBTQ+ movement, Pride month, and related issues like same-sex marriage.
Pride month, not just a day but an entire month, suddenly declared as a national if not global time of obeisance to immorality is particularly egregious because it is visual, “Out, Loud, and Proud” as proponents say, in your face.
In June, nearly nude people parade about on city streets wearing. chains, leather, animal fur, or artificial, exaggerated anatomical parts. This is not pride but perversion. It is not freedom. It is enslavement, bacchanalia, debauchery.
Add Drag Queen, people who now openly chant, “We’re coming for your children,” and you get human debasement on a level with anything you’ve read about in ancient pagan civilizations. Sodom and Gomorrah would feel right at home.
One highly successful marketing and messaging tool developed by the LGBTQ+ movement is the now near-ubiquitous rainbow flag.
The rainbow flag, also known as the gay pride flag or LGBTQ pride flag, is now a globally recognized symbol representing LGBTQ outward identity, support, and “pride.” The original creator of the pride flag is Gilbert Baker, a gay artist who wanted to make a proud statement through a symbol showing diversity. He believed that the rainbow was ideal because it is found in nature. The original gay pride flags flew at the San Francisco Gay Freedom Day Parade celebration on June 25, 1978.
The initial rainbow flag had eight colors, including pink to represent sex, red for life, orange for healing, yellow for sunlight, green for nature, turquoise for art, indigo for harmony, and violet for spirit. Today, the original colors remain except for pink and turquoise.
“On June 26, 2015, the White House was illuminated in the rainbow flag colors to commemorate the legalization of same-sex marriages in all 50 U.S. states, following the Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court decision.” This was the Obama Administration virtue signaling.
In recent years, in the name of “inclusion,” the rainbow flag has been updated and redesigned repeatedly to represent the intersectional diversity of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and Two-Spirit (LGBTQIA2-S) communities, progress, and social justice pride.
Christian apologist and social critique Os Guinness observed, “as Fyodor Dostoevsky wrote in The Brothers Karamazov, if God is dead, everything is permitted. You can be as free as you desire to be. The only limits are the limits of your own thinking.”
Dostoevsky was half right. If God is dead, everything is indeed permitted but you are decidedly not free.In his 2024 book, Our Civilizational Moment: the Waning of the West and the War of the Worlds,Guinness goes on to say, “For Jews and Christians, the rainbow is the symbol of a divine promise–God's covenanted promise originally given to Noah after the flood as the sign of God's commitment to his creation (Gen. 9:8-17).
Whatever humanity does, the rainbow is the reminder that God will keep faith with humanity. God's faithfulness will overshadow the worst that humanity can ever do.
For the sexual revolution, on the other hand, the rainbow stands quite literally as the symbol of Pride. It stands for the revolution and its stated objective of repudiating the Jewish and Christian understanding of the created order.”“Which understanding of the symbol is to prevail? The rainbow as a reminder of God's promise? Or the rainbow as the assertion of human pride? The recent explosion of LGBTQ rainbows across the world is a deliberate inversion of its biblical and centuries–long meaning and a massive statement of where the West is today.”
Ostensibly Christian enterprise “Sojourners” website publishes articles like “How the Pride Flag Speaks to the Promises of God” by an author who says he is a Christian and a gay man.
There is a long and growing list of Protestant churches that reject traditional biblical teaching as they embrace and promote LGBTQ+ lifestyles.
Some Christian colleges and universities now allow or embrace LGBTQ+ students and, for some, staff as well, what’s sometimes called “gay-friendly campuses.”
Christian colleges and universities are currently under enormous pressure and some are changing their view of LBTQ+ matters because they’ve concluded they will lose financial support if they do not, or they will be scrutinized by accrediting agencies, or they have recalibrated their doctrinal views.
Meanwhile, the Word of God has not changed:
“So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them” (Gen. 1:27).
“Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh” (Gen. 2:24).
In Leviticus 20, God lists several sexual sins, not just homosexual sins but several heterosexual sins. In God’s eyes, sexual sin is sexual sin. He is not singling out or somehow condemning only those engaged in homosexuality.
For example, “If a man commits adultery with the wife of his neighbor, both the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death” (Lev. 20:10).
And then also, “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination” (Lev. 18:22).
Or this, “If a man lies with an animal, he shall surely be put to death, and you shall kill the animal. If a woman approaches any animal and lies with it, you shall kill the woman and the animal; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them” (Lev. 20:15-16).
In the New Testament, the Apostle Paul says, “For this reason, God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men” (Rom. 1:26-27).
“Just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire” (Jude 7).
While Christians assume different positions regarding LGBTQ+, in my understanding of the plain English of the Scripture, these sexual behaviors are matters of choice, they are individual and thus personal responsibility, they are spiritual rebellion, not mental illness. I, therefore, cannot embrace or promote heterosexual sin nor LGBTQ+ sin, but I offer these observations:
- Teaching biblical doctrines of sin, or specifically not condoning same-sex relationships, is not ipso factohomophobia, insensitive, or intolerant. Such teaching could be presented in unloving, condemning ways but need not be. God defines sin but always offers love, forgiveness, redemption, and hope. Understanding the chains of darkness, no matter what the sin, is the first step toward understanding the liberty of light.
- There is no biblical or logical justification for bigotry, hatred, gay bashing, bullying, or violence toward LGBTQ+ individuals. None. No room for tearing down rainbow flags that do not belong to us. Such acts are expressions of fear, not love and not faith.
- Christians should support LGBTQ+ people in their civil liberties and civil rights as Americans, not special rights but constitutional rights.
- Christians should avoid labeling people because labels can imply the existence of unalterable conditions. No sin, other than the ultimate and final rejection of Christ, is an unpardonable sin or an unalterable condition. In my view, LGBTQ+ persons are not defined by their sexual orientation or behavior. Consequently, rather than call someone lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender I’d rather say a person has chosen to express his or her sexuality in these ways. The Spirit of God always offers and can enable another Way.
While I cannot endorse LGBTQ+ moral choices and while I reject the perversion of the rainbow’s divine message, I recognize that each person is made in the image of God, that God loves them, and that Christ died for them as he did for me.
“Those people” are not our enemy.
Well, we’ll see you again soon. This podcast is about Discerning What Is Best. If you find this thought-provoking and helpful, follow us on your favorite podcast platform. Download an episode for your friends. For more Christian commentary, check my website, r-e-x-m as in Martin, that’s rexmrogers.com. Or check my YouTube channel @DrRexRogers for more podcasts and video.
And remember, it is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm.
© Rex M. Rogers – All Rights Reserved, 2024
*This podcast blog may be reproduced in whole or in part with a full attribution statement. Contact me or read more commentary on current issues and events at www.rexmrogers.com/ or my YouTube channel @DrRexRogers, or connect with me at www.linkedin.com/in/rexmrogers or https://x.com/RexMRogers.